Those who operate businesses that involve cargo transportation understand the need for a dependable cargo van. The best place to look for a good van will naturally be with one of the world’s great car manufacturers. GM is the second largest automaker while Ford is the fourth largest automaker on the planet right now. So comparing the 2011 GMC Savana 1500 and the Ford E-150 will be a battle between giants that have been in the auto industry long enough to produce dependable cargo trucks that deliver capability, power and efficiency. We will be comparing the two vehicles to see which one will carry the day and be able to carry your load.

Performance

The GMC Savana 1500 has a 4.3L V-6 engine that makes 195 hp and 260 lb-ft of torque. This rear-wheel drive vehicle can tow a maximum recommended weight of 5,900 lbs. On the other hand, the Ford E-150 has a 4.6L V-8 engine that makes 225 hp and a maximum torque of 286 lb-ft. It is also a rear-wheel drive vehicle that can carry up to 6,500 lbs. of cargo. It’s pretty clear that the Ford takes the first round and is the best choice for those primarily looking for a powerful cargo van.

fuel efficiency

As always, fuel consumption is better with smaller engines. The GMC Savana 1500 has a 31-gallon fuel tank and is capable of 15 miles per liter in city traffic and about 20 miles on the highway. The Ford E-150 for its part will give an average of 13 miles per gallon in urban traffic and about 17 miles on the highway. It has a 33-gallon fuel tank and is obviously the less efficient of the two when fuel consumption alone is considered.

Safety

As with all other vehicles, safety is a major concern when it comes to cargo vans as they are not only transporting your valuable goods but will also have your employees on board. Both GMC and Ford vehicles have standard safety and security features that include anti-lock brakes, stability control, airbags, and a security system that includes ignition disable. The GMC also has overhead airbags in addition to the front impact airbags. Parking assist is also available on both vehicles along with low tire pressure, panic and emergency alarms, stolen vehicle tracking and much more. Both the GMC Savana 1500 and the Ford E-150 perform quite well when it comes to safety and most reviews have rated them as good or very good in the area of ​​safety.

exterior features

There isn’t much difference on the exterior of the Ford E-150 and the GMC Savana 1500. They have very similar dimensions, although the GMC is about 8″ longer and may be a better choice for those looking to haul large cargo. Color for both vehicles are also quite similar, as most cargo van customers seem to prefer white, steel gray or deep blue.

interior features

There is slightly more headroom and legroom in the Ford E-150 compared to the GMC. This makes it more comfortable for taller and larger crew members. Both cargo vans seat two, including the driver, and it’s important to note that there’s nothing fancy about these vehicles. Since they are primarily used to carry cargo, style isn’t really a major consideration in this case. It is more important that the vehicle is practical. This is available in the form of a driver information center, gauges, cargo lights, cup holders, radio, CD player and much more. The cargo area floor is made of plastic or rubber to protect it from abrasion and dents. A ventilation system also ensures that the load compartment is ventilated at all times.

conclusion

Assuming the decision to purchase any of these trucks is a business decision, fuel economy and initial cost will be important considerations. The GMC happens to be cheaper compared to buying the Ford and it also has better fuel efficiency which is very important in the transportation business. Being a cargo van, volume is also a major advantage and the GMC again has an advantage here due to its longer body. This means that you can carry more luggage at a lower cost while using the GMC Savana 1500. However, if you are still not convinced that the GMC Savana 1500 has succeeded, you can simply decide to buy it and base your decision on GMC. having more movie appearances than Ford, where you’re usually driven by the good guys, and I’m assuming you’re one of them.