. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Chase Betting Systems (also known as Dog Chase Betting)

If you are an experienced sports bettor, you know the old adage, that if you chase your losses, you will lose your shirt and surely blow your account. Time to throw all that nonsense out the window and learn for the first time that chasing your losses is the best possible scenario. In order to make money using a chase betting system, you need three elements at your disposal:

1. One hundred funds (or account balance)
2. plan
3. A strong stomach to carry out the plan

The old adage says that: he who chases his losses will burn his funds. This is true only if you don’t have a real plan, a strong stomach and a decent bankroll. Let me explain. The old adage comes from the player who bets $100 on Team 1 to win today. Team 1 loses, so tomorrow the player bets $200 on team 2 to win (he thinks he can’t lose twice in a row and more team 2 is a sure thing). Team 2 loses, then on day 3 bets their remaining funds on team 3, loses, and within three days their funds go bust. The old adage is true, for this player… not for you.

You will see that a chase system uses simple math to ensure that you never lose money. However, you have to make sure that you are betting the right amount and you have to have the guts to go through with this program. The system is easy to follow regardless of the sport you are betting on and whether you are chasing a specific team or a sport in general. In 2007, the AFSB completed a study of the NHL’s prosecution system focusing on the Montreal Canadians. The system worked like this: on day 1, you bet $25.00 on Montreal, if Montreal lost, the next time Montreal played you bet $50.00 on Montreal, if Montreal lost again, and on the next game you bet $100, 00 to Montreal, if Montreal lost that game, then $200.00 was wagered on Montreal and so on until Montreal either wins or runs out of money. Once Montreal wins the system resets and the next time Montreal won $25 was bet on Montreal in their next game, if they lost then $50 was bet on Montreal in the next game, however if they won then in the next game $25 bet on Montreal.

This simple system won us $1,210.00 in the NBA Playoffs in 2007 (see our article on absolutely free sports betting regarding the NBA dog chase system). We used this system again in the 2008 MLB playoffs and got $1,373.00.

In the 2010 NCAA basketball season we are using this system in a more generic way. We are playing a Dog-Chase and a Favorite-Chase which is not team specific. Click on our Free Picks link to see the details of the 2010 NCAA Basketball Chase System hard at work.

To ensure your account doesn’t get busted, we recommend that you only wager 1/4 of the normal amount you play per game. For example, if you wager $100 per game, then under a chase system you only need to wager $25.00 per game. This is why:

The chase system is based on the premise that you shouldn’t be able to wrongly handicap a game for seven days straight. If you are betting $100.00 per event in a chase system and you are wrong 7 times in a row, then you will be betting $6,400.00 on the seventh game ($100, $200, $400, $800, $1,600, $3,200, $6,400). To protect yourself, you must bet 1/4 of the normal amount; in our examples, we assume that 1/4 would be $25.00 per event ($25, $50, $100, $200, $400, $800, and $1,600).

Let’s examine the power of the Chase system. Let’s examine a player who bets on 14 games (1 per day, over a 14 day period) and this player doesn’t do so well, wins 6 and loses 8. Example 1 below shows if he just bets $100.00 per game to a normal price. -110 per game. Example 2 shows the same player with the same results, however he bets $25.00 on a Chase system.

Example 1 – Sports bettor who wins 6 bets and loses 8
betting $100.00 per game, one game per day
Game 1: Winner, $91.00
Game 2: Winner, $91.00
Game 3: Loss -$100.00
Game 4: Loss -$100.00
Game 5: Loss -$100.00
Game 6: Winner $91.00
Game 7: Loss -$100.00
Game 8: Loss -$100.00
Game 9: Winner $91.00
Game 10: Loss -$100.00
Game 11: Winner $91.00
Game 12: Loss -$100.00
Game 13: Loss -$100.00
Game 14: Winner $91.00

This player is 6-8 and lost $254.00 over a two week period.

Example 2 – Sports bettor who wins 6 bets and loses 8
wagering $25.00 per game (with chase rules), one game per day
Game 1: Bet 25 and win $23.00, so on the next game:
Game 2: You bet 25 and win $23.00, so on the next game:
Game 3: Bet 25 and lose -$25.00, so on the next game:
Game 4: 50 is bet and loss -$50.00, so on the next game:
Game 5: Bet $100 and lose -$100.00, so in the next game:
Game 6: Bet $200 and win +$182.00, so on the next game:
Game 7: Bet $25 and lose -$25.00, so in the following game:
Game 8: Bet $50 and lose -$50.00, so in the next game:
Game 9: You bet $100 and win $91.00, so in the following game:
Game 10: Bet $25 and lose -$25.00, so on the next game:
Game 11: You bet $50 and win $45.00, so on the next game:
Game 12: Bet $25 and lose -$25.00, so on the next game:
Game 13: Bet $50 and lose -$50.00, so in the next game:
Game 14: Bet $100 and win $91.00

This player is 6-8 and WON $105.00 over a two week period with a losing record.

Obviously you can use this system in any way you want, here are some possibilities:

(1) Equipment specific. In 2007 in the NHL we only used this system betting on Montreal. If Montreal lost we doubled up in the next game, if they won then in the next game we went back to where we started.

(2) Specific position: In 2010, we are playing a dog and a favorite every day in NCAA basketball, if the dog loses, then we duplicate a different dog the next day, if the dog wins, the next day we go back back to our starting point. (The same is true for our favorite system)

(3) Specific position within a series: In the 2007 NBA playoffs, we played the dog during a series, so the dog could be Team 1 in game one vs. Team 2, but then Team 2 could be the dog in game 2. We play the dog no matter who we played in the previous game.

You have to be careful, there will be a point where you find yourself betting more than you have ever wagered before on a game, however when that game skyrockets your winnings skyrocket. Please don’t bet your normal unit, bet 1/4 or less.

If you’re skeptical, check out our 2007 NBA Dog-Chase article, check out our 2008 MLB Playoffs results, or just click the Free Picks link on our website and see how the system works in 2010. Once you see how well it works, you’ll be addicted.

Leave A Comment